Disregard the Pictures

My new rule of thumb for analyzing 9/11 is to not spend any time on arguments that involve pictures of planes or the holes they made in buildings.

There is plenty of other data to work with that draws skepticism to the official 9/11 story. Wondering about what sort of planes hit the WTC or what hit the Pentagon is a waste of time.

The only exceptions to my new "no pictures" rule are:

1) data that suggest flight 93 was shot down, and

2) pictures of the WTC buildings collapsing.

I'm strongly starting to think all arguments that involve pictures of planes or the holes they made in buildings are disinformation.

And of course, the "no plane" theory is complete nonsense, and strongly smacks of a COINTELPRO-type operation.

ROLLING STONES!
(Reject Our Lying Leaders, Slam The Official Nine Eleven Story!)