Humint Events Online: More Evidence Bazant Is Full of Crap!

Sunday, October 26, 2008

More Evidence Bazant Is Full of Crap!

In Bazant's recent "rebuttal" to James Gourley in the Journal of Experimental Mechanics, he discussed how his model rules out that a significant "crush-up" of the upper stories occurs coincident with the "crush-down" of the lower section of tower.

Bazant writes that his model predicts-- "The crush-up simultaneous with the crush down is found to have advanced into the overlying story by only 37 mm for the North Tower and 26 mm for the South Tower."

So he claims (which on its face is laughable) that there was only one inch of the upper tower section destroyed as it went down, crushing the lower tower down.

The problem is that 26 mm for the South tower doesn't even COME CLOSE TO REALITY:


Clearly, AT LEAST ten stories have "crushed up" as the tower goes down. He's off by over three orders of magnitude (over 1,000 inches versus 1 inch) here!

Thus, we have yet another reason why Bazant's collapse analysis is simply crap-- perhaps even criminal crap.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh for god's sake it seems like bazant is not even trying any more - is he supposed to be some kind of scientist?
as if.

12:52 AM  
Blogger spooked said...

oh he's trying-- you should see the amount of equations he put into his rebuttal. the problem is that he can't use math to hide the truth-- and I don't know, maybe he's putting out this ludicrous stuff knowing that it discredits the official story

7:16 AM  
Anonymous www.salamanca-3d.com said...

Wow, there is really much useful data here!

4:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger