Questions of the Day
Even IF nano-thermite is explosive, how could anyone HONESTLY think nano-thermite is powerful enough to COMPLETELY PULVERIZE THE TOWERS INTO DUST?
Also, exactly how much nano-thermite do thermite proponents believe was loaded into the towers and where was it placed?
If people think thermite was used along with conventional explosives, why exactly was the thermite needed?
Also, exactly how much nano-thermite do thermite proponents believe was loaded into the towers and where was it placed?
If people think thermite was used along with conventional explosives, why exactly was the thermite needed?
posted by spooked at 11:13 AM
1 Comments:
i'm sure that they did use thermite to initially cut some of the massive steel beams but certainly thermite is not all that they used.
thermite does not account for the vaporization of all of the massive steel core columns nor the total pulverization of all of the concrete nor the self generating heat lasting for several months at ground zero.
Post a Comment
<< Home